Thursday, March 28, 2019
Science, Technology, and Human Values Essay -- Slaughterhouse-Five Ess
Science, Technology, and valet Values in Sigmund Freuds Civilization and Its Discontents, Henrik Ibsen and Arthur Millers An antagonist of the People, and Kurt Vonneguts Slaughterhouse-FiveTechnology has advanced to the calculate where it touches our lives in nearly every conceivable way-we no longer piss to lift a finger to perform the most trivial tasks. The wealth of information and science we have learned in the last fewer centuries have made our lives easier but non always better, especially when concerning refinement as a whole. Ibsen, Freud, and Vonnegut argue that human values have non kept pace with knowledges unceasing expansion, which has become an anathema for the individual individual and deleterious to societys delectation, albeit without peoples entire comprehension.Henrik Ibsen, as adapted by Arthur Miller, uses his play An Enemy of the People to illustrate how ones contentedness is not necessarily aided by applied science but in many instances in fact hinde red. When the towns primary(prenominal) industry, Kirsten Springs, becomes polluted it raises queries from Dr. Stockmann as to its hazardousness to its occupants. Nearly all residents of the little Norse city rally behind Aslaksen, the printer and leader of the business class, in destroying the doctors credibility so that his accusations of the dangerous water will neer be believed by tourists, which would result in a prodigious financial spill for all. This quaint town is a representation of humanitys tendencies towards egoism. When money is involved, it doesnt matter what the guess is, regardless of physical injuriousness and potential loss of life. The springs symbolize technology and Dr. Stockmann stands for venerable human values. The technology has become prosperous ... ...ges of technology outweigh the disadvantages to the collective human values of society. Science and Technology are not pursued to improve the moral values of man and as such(prenominal) will be perpe tually in disagreement. Humanity will never cease to create new technologies and learn about the universe by dint of scientific methods. A persons values on the other hand are not actively augmented and will suffer. Society is in assume of a refreshing of ethics that stays on par with the knowledge of mans other creations.Works CitedFreud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontents. Ed. and Trans. James Strachey. New York Norton, 1962.Ibsen, Henrik and Hampton, Christopher (translator). An Enemy of the People. capital of Massachusetts Faber and Faber, 1997Stoppard, Tom. Arcadia. London Faber and Faber, 1993.Vonnegut, Kurt. Slaughterhouse-Five. New York Dell Publishing, 1998.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.