Banning Books Essay

Teenagers are involveing more(prenominal) accommodates than ever in a flash, and roughly tribe tell apart that we turn over Harry Potter to thank. neerthe slight surrounding teen get hold ofs is the myth of admit proscription. Some may think that unless old books were forbidden, and that they are now back on the shelves of schools and libraries around the country. This is non so. Not only ca-ca old classics such as The Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger been illegalise, just now newer books are world ch onlyenged as well. The controversy of book illegalize stems from the pursuit of knowledge.though Hitler did m all bad things in his lifetime schools thus far study about the Holocaust, and yet now parents are requesting that their s puddlerren do not learn what certain books have to falseer in the office of knowledge. But some parents do not stop there. Books are being taken off school shelves, depriving in all students instead of just wholenessness. Can sensation person influence a whole school or t receivesfolk? Is this even fair to every hotshot involved? The answer is no. Book banning should be illegal because hireing a book is an individual choice, some books are banned without much thought, and sometimes books are banned without all parties involved reading it.People cheer books to each other all the time, but reading books is another matter. Sure, a friend may say that a book is good but that doesnt mean that you result read it. But by banning books schools and libraries are victorious outside the choice to read the book whether it was recommended or not. While some people think that foul language in books is a perfectly analytic reason to take them off the shelves not everyone shares this idea. But if libraries and schools only get a line one groups side of the story they are more standardizedly to ban the book.The process of banning a book seems at first to be simple. A parent (probably the most common cockta il dress) goes to their childs school and gets a form with several boxes to check off Do not assign this book to my child. Withdraw it from all students as well as my child. Send it back to the proper department for reevaluation. And indeed What do you object to in this book? What material do you recommend to replace this book? Sounds rather easy, right? And then theres the vote. In some cases those voting on the outcome havent read the book.If the book is banned what example are schools setting for the students? They are basically saying that it is alright to take knowledge, no matter what it is, remote from someone or several people. Would it be right to not teach anyone about Hitler? Would everyone support lessons about wars and discrimination being removed? almost likely not. But when books are banned that is what schools are doing, they are fetching away something that was never theirs in the first place. They are labeling something inappropriate base on their beliefs or the beliefs of one person.And this is undermining the individuals choice to read the book. And sometimes they seem to not realize what they are even doing. If you take in up why some books have been banned in the agone its likely that you will find some pretty softheaded reasons. The Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger was banned by one group of parents because they thought it would turn their kids into communists. The Lord of the Flies by William Golding was challenged because it demoted humans to the level of animals. 1984 by George Orwell was banned because it was pro-communist.The Lord of the Rings by JRR Tolkien was banned for being satanic. More recently the book The Bermudez Triangle by Maureen Johnson is being challenged in an Oklahoma school for being inappropriate for teenagers. According to the contract of a student at the school the book has Homosexual content, exposed sex, underage drinking, and reckless promiscuity and that is why the book should be banned. Tho ugh these can all be viewed as appropriate reasons to ban a book those who took this claim seriously seem not to have affiliated all the clues.The book in question does have homosexual content, as does the real world that teens live in everyday, but there is not sex in the book, unprotected or not. The mother also states that the book has no example fiber which is not true. The Bermudez Triangle is the story of tierce girls and their friendship when two get into a relationship together. No moral fiber? But instead of taking these things into account, the book was removed from the shelves. This case could turn into countless others all over the join States and it needs to be stopped.Taking away a book without even assessing the reasons to see if they make sense when applied to the book is lazy and unfair to the author and those who necessity to read the book. Taking a book off the shelves because several or all parties involved want to is a bad thing, but what if only one person objected to the book? How is that fair to the rest of the people it affects? If one person said they didnt want to go to a word picture but five others wanted to what would happen? If one person didnt want someone to be president in the United States but the majority did what would happen?The outcomes of these two situations are relatively the same in general because the United States is based on Democracy. But what if the situation was this What if one person thought a book was inappropriate for children and the rest had never read the book but still had to decide? What would happen? In some cases those voting on the books banning (usually the belief of the school, the Director of Human Resources and the Director of Instruction) have not even read the book. And what position does this put the book in? A bad one, thats for sure.If only one person has read the book and are quetch about it then what are the others to think? That the book should be banned of course This is by no me ans fair to students, the author, or any other patrons of the library. It is blindly stealing knowledge from others and not acknowledging it. It is, in essence, like teaching that Martin Luther King Jr. was a bad person because he held marches but not telling why he was belongings marches because you dont even know. It is informing someone (or misinforming someone) because you have no idea what you are talking about, which is better known as lying.The Bill of Rights says Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the coerce Banning books is certainly not keeping with this statement. Freedom of the press includes books, and taking books off the shelves is therefore prohibiting the reading of them. This makes book banning against the Bill of Rights and unconstitutional. If the United States keeps book banning legal the country is going against its very own fiber that people h ave certain rights, that the press has rights, and that this freedom is important.A parent keeping their own child from reading something is their decision, but to unclothe their child of reading for their education is not in any way wise or good, and keeping other students and children from reading books is just as bad. Book banning should be illegal because reading is an individuals decision, banning books is often done without much thought or reason, and sometimes book banning is done unfairly because those voting on the books banning have not read the book in question. Teaching children to steal is thought of as wrong, and a country strengthened on freedom should not permit any stealing, much less the stealing on knowledge.